Background Image
Previous Page  12 / 176 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 176 Next Page
Page Background INTRODUCTION REGULATION

10

right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, and cultural, religious and

linguistic diversity.

(5) The economic and social integration resulting from the functioning

of the internal market has led to a substantial increase in cross-border

flows of personal data. The exchange of personal data between

public and private actors, including natural persons, associations and

undertakings across the Union has increased. National authorities in

the Member States are being called upon by Union law to cooperate

and exchange personal data so as to be able to perform their duties or

carry out tasks on behalf of an authority in another Member State.

(6) Rapid technological developments and globalisation have brought

new challenges for the protection of personal data. The scale of the

collection and sharing of personal data has increased significantly.

Technology allows both private companies and public authorities to

make use of personal data on an unprecedented scale in order to pursue

their activities. Natural persons increasingly make personal information

available publicly and globally. Technology has transformed both the

economy and social life, and should further facilitate the free flow of

personal data within the Union and the transfer to third countries

and international organisations, while ensuring a high level of the

protection of personal data.

(7) Those developments require a strong and more coherent data

protection framework in the Union, backed by strong enforcement,

given the importance of creating the trust that will allow the digital

economy to develop across the internal market. Natural persons should

have control of their own personal data. Legal and practical certainty

for natural persons, economic operators and public authorities should

be enhanced.

(8) Where this Regulation provides for specifications or restrictions of its

rules by Member State law, Member States may, as far as necessary

for coherence and for making the national provisions comprehensible

to the persons to whom they apply, incorporate elements of this

Regulation into their national law.

(9) The objectives and principles of Directive 95/46/EC remain sound,

but it has not prevented fragmentation in the implementation of data

protection across the Union, legal uncertainty or a widespread public

perception that there are significant risks to the protection of natural

persons, in particular with regard to online activity. Differences in the

level of protection of the rights and freedoms of natural persons, in

particular the right to the protection of personal data, with regard to

the processing of personal data in the Member States may prevent the

free flow of personal data throughout the Union. Those differences may

therefore constitute an obstacle to the pursuit of economic activities

at the level of the Union, distort competition and impede authorities

in the discharge of their responsibilities under Union law. Such a

difference in levels of protection is due to the existence of differences

in the implementation and application of Directive 95/46/EC.

(10) In order to ensure a consistent and high level of protection of natural

persons and to remove the obstacles to flows of personal data within

the Union, the level of protection of the rights and freedoms of natural